Social measurement and social construction in modern applied research
DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2023-18-4-48-63 EDN: DAIQND
Keywords:
measurement in social sciences, social diagnostics, social construction, methodology of applied socio-political research, positivism, interpretivism, critical social scienceAbstract
The purpose of the article is to understand the paradigmatic field of socio-political research in modern Russia. The problem field of implementing the positivist paradigm and carrying out measurement procedures within the framework of this applied research methodology is analyzed. It is proved that quantitative and qualitative research strategies do not serve as different types of research approaches, but as successive stages in the implementation of a single project. A discussion is presented about the possibility and necessity of researchers’ abandoning the principle of non-evaluation of the results of scientific analysis in the field of social knowledge. Some correspondences between the functions of social sciences and the type of research methodology are established. Using the example of applied political analysis, the ways of studying social phenomena and processes, as well as the methodological approaches, methods and tools used for this, are systematized. Particular attention is paid to the problem of unreliability of survey data and limitations of data obtained during monitoring of social media. The capabilities of the cognitive instrumentalist are presented as a means of solving these methodological problems. As a result of the study, arguments are given in favor of the need to intensify the use of the critical social science paradigm in social scientific knowledge and shift the research focus in conditions of civilizational confrontation to social construction (formation, modeling).
References
Ахременко А.С., Бродовская Е.В. Влияние новых информацион-но-коммуникационных технологий на гражданский и политический активизм: «линии напряжения» дискуссионного поля // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. – 2021. –
№ 6 (166). – С. 4–27.
Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания / Пер. с англ. Е. Д. Руткевич. – М.: Academia-центр, Медиум, 1995. – С. 302.
Вебер М. Основные социологические понятия / Пер. с нем.
М. И. Левиной // Вебер М. Избранные произведения. – М.: Прогресс, 1990.
Володенков С.В., Федорченко С.Н. Цифровизация пространства современной политики в условиях глобальных технологических трансформаций: актуальные научные подходы, модели и сценарии // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 12: Политические науки. – 2022. – № 2. – С. 46–57.
Домбровская А.Ю., Огнев А.С. Консолидационный потенциал символов России будущего в сознании российской молодежи: ин-струментальная когнитивистика // Среднерусский вестник обще-ственных наук. – 2022. – Т. 17. – № 6. – С. 87–105.
Дюркгеймъ Э. Самоубійство / Пер. А. Н. Ильинскій. - СПБ:
Н.П. Карбасниковъ, 1912.
Стригунов К.С., Манойло А.В. Технологии информационных опе-раций, привязанных к политически значимым событиям // Гражда-нин. Выборы. Власть. – 2021. – № 1 (19). – С. 161–171.
Gоffmаn Е. Frаmе Аnаlуѕіѕ: An Essay on the Organization of Experi-ence. New York: Harper and Row, 1974. Р. 575.
Ikenberry G.J. History's heavy hand: institutions and the politics of the state. Paper presented at the conference “New Perspectives on Institu-tions”, University of Maryland, October 1994. P.2.
Neuman L.W. Social research methods: qualitative and quantita-tive approaches, 2nd ed. Boston etc.: Allyn and Bacon, 1991.
Petrov A.P.Ch., Akhremenko A.S., Zheglov S.A., Kruchinskaia E.V. Is network structure important for protest mobilization? findings from agent-based modeling // Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and So-cial Changes. 2021. № 6 (166). С. 226-253.
Ѕсhutz А. Рhеnоmеnоlоgу аnd thе Ѕосіаl Ѕсіеnсеѕ // Соllесtеd Ра-реrѕ І: Thе Рrоblеm оf Ѕосіаl Rеаlіtу. Тhе Наguе: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962.
Skinner B.F. About Behaviorism. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 2011 . – 304 c.
Spencer H. The principles of sociology. New York : D. Appleton and Company, 1899.
Ahremenko, A., Brodovskaya, E. (2021) Vliyanie novyh informacion-no-kommunikacionnyh tekhnologij na grazhdanskij i politicheskij ak-tivizm: "linii napryazheniya" diskussionnogo polya [Impact of New Infor-mation and Communication Technologies on Civic and Political Activism: «Tension Lines» of the Discussion Field] // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny [Monitoring of Pub lic Opi ni on: Eco no mic and So cial Chan ges]. - № 6 (166). - P. 4-27. (In Russ.)
Berger, P., Lukman, T. (1995) Social'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya [The Social Construction of Reality: A Trea-tise in the Sociology of Knowledge] / Per. s angl. E. D. Rutkevich. M.: Aca-demia-centr, Medium. - P. 302. (In Russ.)
Veber, M. (1990) Osnovnye sociologicheskie ponyatiya [Basic Socio-logical Terms]/ Per. s nem. M. I. Levinoj // Veber M. Izbrannye pro-izvedeniya. - M.: Progress. (In Russ.)
Volodenkov, S., Fedorchenko S. (2022) Cifrovizaciya prostranstva sovremennoj politiki v usloviyah global'nyh tekhnologicheskih transfor-macij: aktual'nye nauchnye podhody, modeli i scenario [Digitalization of the modern politics space in the age of global technological transfor-mation: relevant scientific approachs] // Vestnik Moskovskogo universi-teta [Moscow University Bulletin]. Seriya 12: Politicheskie nauki [Political science]. - №2. -
P. 46-57. (In Russ.)
Dombrovskaya, A., Ognev, A. (2022) Konsolidacionnyj potencial sim-volov Rossii budushchego v soznanii rossijskoj molodezhi: instrumen-tal'naya kognitivistika [Consolidation potential of the Symbols of Russia of the Future in the minds of Russian youth: instrumental cognitive science] // Srednerusskij v
estnik obshchestvennyh nauk [Сentral Russian Bulletin of Social Sciences]. – Vol. 17. - № 6. - P. 87-105. (In Russ.)
Dyurkgejm", E. (1912) Samoubіjstvo [Suicide]/ Per. A. N. Il'inskіj. — SPB: N. P. Karbasnikov". (In Russ.)
Strigunov, K., Manojlo, A. (2021) Tekhnologii informacionnyh operacij, privyazannyh k politicheski znachimym sobytiyam [Technologies of information operations linked to politically significant events] //Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast' [Civilian, Election, Authority]. - № 1 (19). - P. 161-171. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dombrovskaya A. Y.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.