cognitive maps of information flows of consolidated and deconsolidated directions in russian social media (2023-2024)
DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2024-19-3-155-176 EDN: EIBRLO
Keywords:
consolidation, deconsolidation, social media, cognitive map of information flows, Internet communication, information managementAbstract
The relevance of the stated topic is dictated by the increasing information and military confrontation between the Russian Federation and the West and the need in these conditions to monitor the level of social consolidation, which largely depends on the social and media support of the solidarity effect on Russian society.
The purpose of the study is to identify the key characteristics of cognitive maps of information flows representing attitudes towards consolidation and deconsolidation of Russian society.
The objectives of the analysis are to identify contexts, triggers, discourses, target audiences, actors, technologies for the formation of public attitudes, to determine the pool of actors and authors of consolidation and deconsolidation content of the Russian segment of social media.
The characteristics of the consolidation flow include patterns of using collective security as a basis for solidarity, maintaining a value consensus, positive national-state identity, and maintaining sovereignty as a basic value.
Signs of deconsolidation flows are the exploitation of social deprivation to undermine public trust in the authorities, devaluation of the importance of independence and state sovereignty, instructional, irrational, and manipulative influence on public opinion. In conclusion, as one of the results of the study, measures for information support of consolidation work in social media are presented
References
Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реально-сти. Трактат по социологии знания / Пер. Е.Д. Руткевич. – М.: Ме-диум, 1995. – 323 с.
Брега А. В. Анализ условий и факторов социально-политической устойчивости современного российского государ-ства / А. В. Брега, Д. Д. Осинина // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. – 2022. – Т. 12, № 5. – С. 88–96. – DOI 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-5-88-96. – EDN TIDKTW.
Гуазаа Л.В. Концептуальная разработанность категории «по-литическое единство» на современном этапе: обзор и анализ исто-риографии // Власть. – 2021. – № 4. – С. 172–179. – DOI 10.31171/vlast.v29i4.8401. – EDN CKDIGA.
Дюркгейм Э. О разделении общественного труда. Метод социологии / Пер. с фр. и послесловие Л. Б. Гофмана. – М.: Наука, 1990. – 575 с.
Ильичева Л.Е., Рогачев С.В. Риски и вызовы социальной консо-лидации российского общества в условиях цивилизационной трансформации // Власть. – 2022. – Том 30. – № 5. – С. 88–97. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9243. – EDN AHVYMN.
Кармова М.Р., Максимова О.И. Межкультурная коммуникация: путь к солидарности между этническими сообществами // Гума-нитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. – 2022. –
Т. 12. – № 3. – С. 30–35. – DOI 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-3-30-35. – EDN HBCULR.
Кармова М.Р., Максимова О.И. Феномен коммуникативной со-лидарности и коммуникативного конфликта в социальных ме-диа // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. – 2023 – Т. 13. – № 1. – С. 122–127. – DOI 10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-1-122-127. – EDN NSOXMY.
Кучинов А.М. Общее благо в контексте солидаризации при во-енных процессах // Власть. – 2023. – Том 31. – № 4. – С. 115–120. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9699– EDN HZWRKL.
Реутов Е.В., Реутова М.Н., Шавырина И.В. Социальная соли-дарность в установках и практиках населения // Власть. – 2016. – Том 24. – № 4. – С. 94–99. – EDN VVNHVV.
Парсонс Т. Понятие общества: компоненты и их взаимоот-ношения // THESIS. – 1993. – № 2. – С. 94–122.
Сартори Дж. Управляемая демократия и управляющая демо-кратия // Мир политики. Суждения и оценки западных политоло-гов. – М., 1992. – С. 122–127.
Хайек Ф.А. Право, законодательство и свобода: Современное понимание либеральных принципов справедливости и политики. – М.: ИРИСЭН, 2006. – 644 с.
Deutsch K.W. Social mobilization and political development // American political science rev. – Wash., 1961. – Vol. 55, N 3. – P. 493–514.
Heckathorn D.D. Extensions of the prisoner’s dilemma paradigm: The altruist’s dilemma and group solidarity // Sociological Theory. – 1991. – № 9 (1). – P. 34–52.
Lenz J., Fernandez R., Quirland Lazo C. The John Kingdon’s “Poli-cy streams” approach: a conceptual framework for understanding a risk sharing agreement pilot design by first time in Chile. Value in Health. – 2016 – Vol. 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.859.
Sorokin P.A. The Ways and Power of Love: Types, Factors, and Techniques of Moral Transformation. Templeton Press, 2002. – 584 p.
References:
Berger, P., Lukman, T. (1995) Social design of reality. Treatise on the sociology of knowledge. Tr. E.D. Rutkevich. – M.: Medium, 323 p.
(In Russ.)
Brega, A.V., Osinina, D.D. (2022) Analysis of conditions and factors of socio-political stability of the modern Russian state. Humanities and Social Science. Bulletin of the Financial University. T. 22. no. 5. – DOI 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-5-88-96. – EDN TIDKTW. (In Russ.)
Guazaa, L. V. (2021) Conceptual elaboration of the category “polit-ical unity” at the present stage: review and analysis of historiography. Vlast’.no.4, p.172-179. – DOI 10.31171/vlast.v29i4.8401. – EDN CKDI-GA. (In Russ.)
Deutsch, K.W. (1961) Social mobilization and political develop-ment. American political science rev. Wash., Vol. 55, N 3, P. 493–514.
5Durkheim, E. (1990) On the division of social labor. Method of sociology / Transl. from fr. and afterword by L.B. Hoffman. – M.: Nauka, 575 p. (In Russ.)
Ilyicheva, L. E., Rogachev, S. V. (2022) Risks and calls for social consolidation of Russian society in the conditions of civilizational transformation. Vlast’. Volume 30. no. 5, p. 88-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9243 – EDN AHVYMN. (In Russ.)
Karmova, M. R., Maksimova. O. I. (2022) Intercultural communi-cation: the path to solidarity between ethnic communities. Humanities and Social Science. Bulletin of the Financial University. T. 12. no. 3,
P. 30-35. DOI 10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-3-30-35. – EDN HBCULR. (In Russ.)
Karmova, M. R., Maksimova, O. I. (2023) The phenomenon of communicative solidarity and communicative conflict in social media. Humanities and Social Science. Bulletin of the Financial University. T. 13.
no. 1, p. 122-127. – DOI 10.26794/2226-7867-2023-13-1-122-127. – EDN NSOXMY. (In Russ.)
Kuchinov, A. M. (2023) The common good in several solidariza-tions during military processes. Vlast’. Volume 31. no. 4, pp. 115-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v31i4.9699. – EDN HZWRKL. (In Russ.)
Lenz, J., Fernandez, R., Quirland, Lazo C. (2016) The John King-don’s “Policy streams” approach: a conceptual framework for under-standing a risk sharing agreement pilot design by first time in Chile. Value in Health. Vol. 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.859
Reutov. E.V., Reutova, M.N., Shavyrina, I.V. (2016) Social soli-darity in attitudes and labor practices. Vlast’. Vol. 24, no. 4. P. 94-99. – EDN VVNHVV. (In Russ.)
Parsons. T. (1993) The concept of the components of society and their approval. THESIS. no. 2, P. 94-122. (In Russ.)
Hayek, F.A. (2006) Law, legislation and freedom: modern un-derstanding of liberal laws and policies. M.: IDISES. 644 p. (In Russ.)
Hekatorn, D.D. (1991) Extensions of the prisoner's dilemma paradigm: the altruist's dilemma and group solidarity. Sociological theory.
no. 9 (1), P. 34-52.
Sartori, G. (1992) Upravliaemaia demokratiia i up-ravliaiushchaia demokratiia [Manageable democracy and managing democracy]. Mir politiki. Suzhdeniia i otsenki zapadnykh politologov [World of politics: judgment and estimation of the western political scientists]. – M. – P. 122– 127 (In Russ.)
Sorokin, P.A. (2002) The ways and power of love: types, factors and methods of moral transformation. Templeton Press, 584 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Anna Y. Dombrovskaya Elena V. Brodovskaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
