Features of communications of regional social and political actors of network interaction

DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2024-19-6-14-34 EDN: NPILJK

Authors

  • Larisa I. Nikovskaya Center of Political Science and Political Sociology of the Institute of Sociology Federal Research Sociological Center, Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Federation

Keywords:

network society, network approach, communication, communicative efficiency, interaction, civil society, intersectoral partnership, dialogue, hierarchy, deliberation, contradictions, regional actors, virtual format

Abstract

The purse is to consider the features of the communication processes of regional socio-political actors, the emerging network interaction in the studied regions, using the example of the Vologda and Yaroslavl regions.

Subject of the research. Using the analysis of empirical data, to study the formats of integration of dialogue and monologue forms of socio-political communication as a way to expand the framework of direct democracy, the possibilities of implementing large-scale Internet discussions, intensifying communication and interaction between the state and society in the public space. The methodological basis is presented by the results of a qualitative study with representatives of three main target groups of the regional community of the Vologda and Yaroslavl regions on the relationship between hierarchical and network principles of communication in building interaction in solving socially significant problems of the region.

Network formats of interaction between government and society are characterized by the diversification of numerous new "players" in the public space, accustoming the state to a coordinating and moderating role in the process of converting the capabilities and resources of different participants in the interaction into a common public result. It is noted that in the conditions of networking, in addition to the involvement of traditional civil society actors in initiatives and projects, the influence of small initiative groups and individuals is increasing.

Research results. Dialogical communication opportunities are best realized by intersectoral partnership technologies. It is shown that innovative intersectoral partnership technologies are successfully developing in the Vologda region and the process of public deliberation regarding the region's development strategy is clearly presented. In the Yaroslavl region, on the contrary, the process of dialogue between the authorities and society is in a condition in which the civil and public sectors live according to their own ontological logic. The demand for real dialogue is emasculated, which leads to the formalization of the use of network communication platforms.

Author Biography

Larisa I. Nikovskaya, Center of Political Science and Political Sociology of the Institute of Sociology Federal Research Sociological Center, Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Federation

Doctor of Social Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher of the Department for the Study of Socio-Political Relations of the Russian Federation

SPIN: 6715-5452, AuthorID: 77247,
 Researcher Id: C-5514-2019, Scopus: 8911366500

References

Кастельс М. Общество сетевых структур // Новая постиндустриальная волна на Западе: антология / под ред. В. Л. Иноземцева. – М.: Acаdemia, 1994. – С. 469. – 640 с.

Кастельс, М. Власть коммуникации / М. Кастельс. – 4 издание. – Москва : Национальный исследовательский университет "Высшая школа экономики", 2023. – 591 с. – (Переводные учебники ВШЭ). – ISBN 978-5-7598-2924-9. – DOI 10.17323/978-5-7598-2924-9. – EDN KPGAGG.

Косыгина, К. Е. Межсекторное социальное партнерство как основа муниципальной публичной политики / К. Е. Косыгина,

Ю. В. Уханова // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. – 2024. – Т. 27, № 1. – С. 192-215. – DOI 10.31119/jssa.2024.27.1.9. – EDN DDFPVW.

Курочкин А.В. «Коммуникативная эффективность»: концептуализация понятия и перспективы использования в теории и практике государственного управления // Человек. Сообщество. Управление. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 83–92. DOI:10.7256/2454-0684.2017.8.20966

Курочкин А.В., Шерстобитов А.С. Политика и государственное управление в условиях сетевого общества. – СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУ, 2012. – 151 с. ISBN 978-5-288-05365-8

Лепский, В. Е. Методологический и философский анализ развития проблематики управления / В. Е. Лепский. – Москва : Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Когито-Центр", 2019. – 340 с. – ISBN 978-5-89353-547-1. – EDN RRKGAO.

Никовская, Л. И. О состоятельности институтов и субъектов муниципальной публичной политики (на примере Костромской и Ярославской областей) / Л. И. Никовская, В. Н. Якимец // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2021. – № 3. – С. 38-56. – DOI 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.04. – EDN XSLFMW.

Трансформация политических отношений в процессе взаимодействия сетевых феноменов и иерархических структур / О. М. Михайленок, А. В. Брега, Б. И. Зеленко [и др.] // Социально-гуманитарные знания. – 2022. – № 3. – С. 297-340. – DOI 10.34823/SGZ.2022.3.51816. – EDN JHRPUW.

Трансформация политических отношений в сетевом обществе / О. М. Михайленок, А. В. Брега, О. А. Воронкова [и др.]. – Москва : Федеральный научно-исследовательский социологический центр Российской академии наук, 2023. – 327 с. – ISBN 978-5-89697-411-6. – DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-411-6.2023. – EDN FDCSKE.

Цикл стратегических сессий завершился в Вологодской области. – URL: https://vologod.er.ru/activity/news/edinoross-sergej-zhestyannikov-predlozheniya-vologzhan-eto-baza-ot-kotoroj-budem-ottalkivatsya-v-formirovanii-strategii-razvitiya-regiona-na-blizhajshie-pyat-let (дата обращения: 10.11.2024).

Meyer, D. S., (2001) “Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries, edited by Susan Pharr and Robert Putnam, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2000). Reviewed by David S. Meyer”, Journal of Political Ecology 8(1), 84-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.2458/v8i1.21617

Scharpf, F. (2000) Interdependence and Democratic legitimation/ Disaffected democracies: Whats troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Р.24-56.

Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic Theory and Network Governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 24, P.693 - 720. DOI:10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383

Kastel's, M. (1994) Obshchestvo setevykh struktur. Novaia postindu-strial'naia volna na Zapade: antologiia / pod red. V. L. Ino-zemtseva. M.: Academia, P. 469. – 640. (In Russ.).

Kastel's, M. (2023) Vlast' kommunikatsii. 4 izdanie. Moskva: Natsional'nyi issledovatel'skii universitet "Vysshaia shkola ekonomiki", 591 p. – (Perevodnye uchebniki VShE). – ISBN 978-5-7598-2924-9. – DOI 10.17323/978-5-7598-2924-9. – EDN KPGAGG. (In Russ.).

Kosygina, K. E., Ukhanova Iu. V. (2024) Mezhsektornoe sotsial'noe partnerstvo kak osnova munitsipal'noi publichnoi politiki. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii. T. 27, no. 1, p. 192-215. – DOI 10.31119/jssa.2024.27.1.9. – EDN DDFPVW. (In Russ.).

Kurochkin, A.V. (2013)«Kommunikativnaia effektivnost'»: kontsep-tualizatsiia poniatiia i perspektivy ispol'zovaniia v teorii i praktike gosudarstvennogo upravleniia. Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Up-ravlenie. no.4. p. 83–92. DOI:10.7256/2454-0684.2017.8.20966 (In Russ.).

Kurochkin, A.V., Sherstobitov, A.S. (2012) Politika i gosudarstven-noe upravlenie v usloviiakh setevogo obshchestva. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU, 151 p. ISBN 978-5-288-05365-8 (In Russ.).

Lepskii, V. E. (2019) Metodologicheskii i filosofskii analiz razvitiia problematiki upravleniia. Moskva: Obshchestvo s ogranichennoi ot-vetstvennost'iu "Kogito-Tsentr", 340 p. – ISBN 978-5-89353-547-1. – EDN RRKGAO. (In Russ.).

Nikovskaia, L. I., Iakimets, V. N. (2021) O sostoiatel'nosti insti-tutov i sub"ektov munitsipal'noi publichnoi politiki (na primere Ko-stromskoi i Iaroslavskoi oblastei). Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia. no.3. P. 38-56. – DOI 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.04. – EDN XSLFMW. (In Russ.).

Transformatsiia politicheskikh otnoshenii v protsesse vzai-modeistviia setevykh fenomenov i ierarkhicheskikh struktur / O. M. Mikhailenok, A. V. Brega, B. I. Zelenko [i dr.]. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniia. 2022. no. 3. P. 297-340. – DOI 10.34823/SGZ.2022.3.51816. – EDN JHRPUW. (In Russ.).

Transformatsiia politicheskikh otnoshenii v setevom obshche-stve / O. M. Mikhailenok, A. V. Brega, O. A. Voronkova [i dr.]. – Moskva: Federal'nyi nauchno-issledovatel'skii sotsiologicheskii tsentr Rossiis-koi akademii nauk, 2023. 327 p. – ISBN 978-5-89697-411-6. – DOI 10.19181/monogr.978-5-89697-411-6.2023. – EDN FDCSKE. (In Russ.).

Tsikl strategicheskikh sessii zavershilsia v Vologodskoi oblasti. – URL: https://vologod.er.ru/activity/news/edinoross-sergej-zhestyannikov-predlozheniya-vologzhan-eto-baza-ot-kotoroj-budem-ottalkivatsya-v-formirovanii-strategii-razvitiya-regiona-na-blizhajshie-pyat-let (data obrashcheniia: 10.11.2024). (In Russ.).

Meyer, D. S., (2001) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries, edited by Susan Pharr and Robert Putnam, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2000). Reviewed by David S. Meyer, Journal of Political Ecology 8(1), 84-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.2458/v8i1.21617. (In Eng.).

Scharpf, F. (2000) Interdependence and Democratic legitima-tion/ Disaffected democracies: Whats troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press. R.24-56. (In Eng.).

Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic Theory and Network Govern-ance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 24, P.693 - 720. DOI:10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383. (In Eng.).

Том 19 выпуск 6 2024

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Nikovskaya Л. И. (2024). Features of communications of regional social and political actors of network interaction: DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2024-19-6-14-34 EDN: NPILJK. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 19(6), 14–34. Retrieved from https://orelvestnik.ru/index.php/srvon/article/view/67

Issue

Section

Политология и государственная политика