Regional peculiarities of the reputation of russian power: national and religious factors of formation
DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2023-18-6-121-141 EDN: NFSNVX
Keywords:
reputation of the Russian authorities, public authority, regional executive power, reputation content, reputation characteristics, factors of reputation formation, national and religious factorsAbstract
The purpose of the research in presenting its results within the framework of this article is to determine the peculiarities of the content of the reputation of the Russian power in the regions of the Russian Federation, taking into account the national and religious factors of its formation.
The object of the study is the Russian political space on the axis of interaction "power – society". Subject – the reputation of large-scale institutional subjects - Russian power in general (state and municipal power of the Russian Federation - public power) and various levels and branches of power (by the example of the reputation of the state executive power of the subject of the Russian Federation).
The results of a sociological study of the population opinion of 10 regions are presented. National and religious factors of reputation formation are interpreted based on the degree of predominance of single- or multi-ethnic composition of the region and one of the two most widespread religions practiced in Russia: Orthodoxy or Islam.
The fundamental unity in the "filling" of the content of the reputation of the Russian power in the presence of regional peculiarities in the part of setting slightly different priorities in the choice of reputational characteristics is determined; no direct dependence on the studied factors is revealed.
References
Барбашин М. Ю. Методологические возможности «Блумингтонской школы» и перспективы развития современного неоинституционализма // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. – 2014. – Т. 17. – № 1. – С. 98–111. – URL: http://jourssa.ru/sites/all/files/volumes/2014_1/Barbashin_2014_1.pdf.
Беляева Л. А. Консолидация российского общества в новых геополитических реалиях // Социологические исследования. – 2023. – № 3. – C. 150–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250024038-4.
Верминенко Ю. В. Применение метода экспертного опроса в диагностике конструирования социальных проблем в дискурсе власти: на примере проблем наркотизации и алкоголизации в российском обществе // Вестник Орловского государственного университета. Серия: Новые гуманитарные исследования. – 2012. – № 1 (21). – С. 60–65.
Калмыков Н. Н., Краснопольский И. А. Реформирование системы государственной службы Российской Федерации // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 21: Управление (государство и общество). – 2016. – № 2. – С. 44–61.
Панов П. В. Институционализм(ы): объяснительные модели и причинность // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2015. – № 3. – С. 39–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.03.09.
Попова З. Д., Стернин И. А. Когнитивная лингвистика. – М.: АСТ, Восток-Запад, 2007. – 315 c.
Черкашин М. Д. Доверие населения к органам власти как фактор социальной консолидации общества // Коммуникология: электронный научный журнал. – 2019. – Т. 4. – № 3. – С. 74–82. – URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41635233.
Чертков А. Н. Публичная власть: состав, единство и сущность взаимодействия // Конституционное и муниципальное право. – 2020. – № 10. – С. 19–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2020-10-19-23.
Bjørnå H. Reputational assets for local political leadership // Heliyon. – 2021. – Vol.7. – Iss. 8: e07800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07800.
Bustos E.O. Organizational Reputation in the Public Administration: A Systematic Literature Review // Public Administration Review. – 2021. – Vol. 81. – № 2. – P. 731–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13363.
Chmielewski P. New institutionalism: A platform for productive integration in social science // Warwas forum of economic sociology. – 2010. – Vol. 1. – № 1. – P. 9–88. – URL: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/New-Institutionalism%3A-a-Platform-for-Productive-in-Chmielewski/ca137e5e4e1c9ae8223acb60024ce29dd3a87d0f.
Ehrenbrink P. Expert Survey – Triggers for State Reactance. In: The Role of Psychological Reactance in Human–Computer Interaction. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services. – Springer, Cham., 2021. – P. 45–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30310-5_5.
Eisenegger M. Trust and reputation in the age of globalisation // Jo-achim Klewes, Robert Wreschniok (eds.). Reputation Capital. Building and Maintaining Trust in the 21st Century. – Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2009. – P. 11–22.
Gemenis K. An iterative expert survey approach for estimating par-ties’ policy positions // Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Meth-odology. – 2015. – Vol. 49(6). – P. 2291–2306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0109-5.
Peters G. Institutional Theory in Political Science: "The New Institu-tionalism". – L.; N.Y.: Continuum, 2005. – 183 p.
Barbashin, M.Yu. (2014) Metodologicheskie vozmozhnosti "Bluming-tonskoj shkoly`" i perspektivy` razvitiya sovremennogo neoinstitucional-izma [The formation of the “Bloomington school”: methodological oppor-tunities and perspectives of contemporary new institutionalism develop-ment] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii [The journal of soci-ology and social anthropology]. – Vol. 17. – № 1. – P. 98–111. (in Russ.)
Belyaeva, L.A. (2023) Konsolidaciya rossijskogo obshhestva v novy`x geopoliticheskix realiyax [Consolidation of Russian Society in New Geopo-litical Realities] // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. – № 3. – P. 150–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250024038-4. (in Russ.)
Verminenko, Yu.V. (2012) Primenenie metoda ekspertnogo oprosa v diagnostike konstruirovaniya social'nyh problem v diskurse vlasti: na primere problem narkotizacii i alkogolizacii v rossijskom obshchestve [Application of expert survey method in diagnosing the construction of so-cial problems in the discourse of power: on the example of drug and alco-hol problems in Russian society] // Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Vestnik of Orel State University. Series: New Humanitarian Studies]. – № 1(21). – P. 60–65. (In Russ.)
Kalmykov, N.N., Krasnopol'skij, I.A. (2016) Reformirovanie sistemy gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federacii [Reforming the Public Ser-vice System of the Russian Federation]// Vestnik Moskovskogo universi-teta. Seriya 21: Upravlenie (gosudarstvo i obshchestvo) [Bulletin of Mos-cow University. Series 21: Management (State and Society)]. – № 2. –
P. 44–61. (In Russ.)
Panov, P.V. (2015) Institucionalizm(y): ob"yasnitel'nye modeli i prichinnost' [Institutionalism: explanatory models and causality] // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya [Policy. Political studies]. – 2015. – №3. –
P. 39–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.03.09. (In Russ.)
Popova, Z.D., Sternin, I.A. (2007) Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive linguistics]. – M.: AST, East-West. – 315 p. (In Russ.)
Cherkashin, M.D. (2023) Doverie naseleniya k organam vlasti kak faktor social`noj konsolidacii obshhestva [The public government: the composition, unity and interaction essence] // Kommunikologiya: e`lektronny`j nauchny`j zhurnal [Communicology: the electronic scientific journal]. – Vol 8. – № 2. – P. 74–82. – URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41635233. (In Russ.)
Chertkov, A.N. (2020) Publichnaya vlast`: sostav, edinstvo i sushhnost` vzaimodejstviya [The public government: the composition, uni-ty and interaction essence] // Konstitucionnoe i municipal`noe pravo [Constitutional and municipal law]. – № 10. – P. 19– 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2020-10-19-23. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rozanova N.N.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
