Identification of significant factors in forming the reputation of Russian authorities: according to the results of a sociological study
DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2024-19-5-99-123 EDN: TDPUPU
Keywords:
reputation of Russian authorities, factors of reputation assessment, formation of positive reputation, forecast model, mathematical statistics, Data MiningAbstract
The purpose of the article is to identify significant factors in the formation of the reputation of Russian authorities, determining the relationship between them and the assessment of the reputation by the population.
The empirical basis of the study is an array of data - the results of mass sociological surveys of the population conducted in 2021-2022 in 11 constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
The use of methods of mathematical statistics and Data Mining allowed us to obtain the following results.
The following factors have a statistically significant impact on the assessment of the reputation of Russian authorities for respondents: features of reputation perception (shift in the range of equivalence of perception; interest in the activities of the authorities; trust in people and organizations; personal satisfaction with life; assessment of the substantive characteristics of reputation).
When assessing the reputation of Russian authorities, respondents, in fact, assess its honesty, responsibility, fairness, strength of power, closeness to people, professionalism and incorruptibility. These characteristics and their assessment determine the overall assessment of the reputation of Russian authorities.
The predictive model constructed in this case allows us to correctly predict 57.5% of the total volume of values. The predictive role of the model is determined by the possibility of targeted influence on these factors for a corresponding change in public opinion aimed at increasing the assessment and forming a positive reputation.
Prospects for further research are associated with studying the influence of the entire set of factors in the formation of the reputation of Russian authorities, constructing an appropriate predictive model with an increase in its accuracy, and empirical testing using the example of a pilot region.
References
Ботнарь Д.С., Сизганова Е.Ю. Формирование позитивной цифровой репутации органов государственной и муниципальной власти // Вестник Чебоксарского филиала Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации. – 2020. – № 4 (23). – С. 92–99. EDN: LEYUEA.
Баженова Е.А., Ширинкина М.А. Коммуникативные приемы управ-ления цифровой репутацией органов исполнительной власти // Вирту-альная коммуникация и социальные сети. – 2024. – Т. 3. № 3 (11). – С. 255–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2024-3-3-255-263. EDN: AVOISJ.
Дубновицкая А.А. (2021). Кто доволен своей зарплатой? О чем говорят данные РМЭЗ // Прикладная эконометрика. – 2021. –
№4 (64). – С. 49–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2021-64-49-69. EDN: XHNASD.
Ильичева Л.Е., Лапин А.В. Ценностные и социальные детер-минанты устойчивого развития российских регионов в эпоху гло-бальной цивилизационной деформации: монография. – М.: «Изда-тельство «Проспект», 2022. – 344 с. EDN: YYBPSL.
Koссова Е.В., Косорукова М.А. Оценивание влияния высшего образования на здоровье: сравнение многомерной рекурсивной пробит-модели и мэтчинга // Прикладная эконометрика. – 2023. –
№ 1 (69). – С. 65–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2023-69-65-90. EDN: CVZBKK.
Ландерова А.А., Россенко Л.А. Репутационные факторы субъ-екта Российской Федерации: социокультурный и политический аспекты. – Вестник Поволжского института управления. – 2022. – Т. 22. –
№ 1. – С. 100–110. DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2022-1-100-110. EDN: TGSVTC.
Носко В.П. Эконометрика: в 2-х книгах. Кн.1. – М.: Дело, 2021. – 704 c.
Ревенко В.В. Дифференциация понятий «образ», «имидж», «репутация» и «бренд» в политическом дискурсе // Проблемы управления (Минск). – 2024. – № 3 (93). – С. 96–100. EDN: PNLDEX.
Рогачев С.В., Ильичева М.В., Иванов А.В. Социальное доверие и процесс консолидации общества: новые возможности и риски // Известия Тульского государственного университета. Гуманитар-ные науки. – 2022. – Выпуск 1. – С. 129-140. URL:. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6141-2022-1-129-140 EDN: NOCHSG.
Черкашин М.Д. Доверие населения к органам власти как фактор социальной консолидации общества // Коммуникология: электронный научный журнал. – 2019. – Т. 4. № 3. – С. 74–82. EDN: RTDZET
Шестакова Е.В. Использование новых цифровых технологий для управления репутацией в системе органов государственной власти (на примере Пермского края) // Города и местные сообще-ства. – 2022. – Т. 1. – С. 295–304. EDN: SIOMQI.
Agresti, A. (2012) Categorical Data Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 742 p.
Bustos, E.O. (2021) Organizational Reputation in the Public Ad-ministration: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration Review. Vol. 81. no. 2, P. 731–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13363.
Lee, D. & Van Ryzin, G.G. (2019) Measuring bureaucratic reputa-tion: Scale development and validation. Governance. Vol. 32. no. 1. Pp. 177–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12371.
Lee, D. &Van Ryzin, G.G. (2020) Bureaucratic reputation in the eyes of citizens: an analysis of US federal agencies. International Re-view of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 86. no. 1. Pp. 183–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318769127.
McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression Models for Ordinal Data // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). no. 42 (2).
Pp. 109–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x.
Morrow-Howell, N. & Proctor, E. (1992). The Use of Logistic Re-gression in Social Work Research. Journal of Social Service Research. Vol. 16. no. 1-2. Pp. 87–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v16n01_05.
Wasserman, S. & Pattison, P. (1996) Logit models and logistic re-gressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika. no. 61(3), P. 401–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294547.
Yang, J., Dong, C. & Chen, Y. (2021) Government’s Economic Per-formance Fosters Trust in Government in China: Assessing the Moder-ating Effect of Respect for Authority. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 154. no. 2. P. 545–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02553-y.
Botnar`, D.S. and Sizganova, E.Yu. (2020) Formirovanie pozitivnoj cifrovoj reputacii organov gosudarstvennoj i municipal`noj vlasti. Vestnik Cheboksarskogo filiala Rossijskoj akademii narodnogo xo-zyajstva i gosudarstvennoj sluzhby` pri Prezidente Rossijskoj Federacii. no. 4 (23).
P. 92–99. EDN: LEYUEA. (In Russ.).
Bazhenova, E.A. and Shirinkina, M.A. (2024) Kommunikativny`e priemy` upravleniya cifrovoj reputaciej organov ispolnitel`noj vlasti. Virtual`naya kommunikaciya i social`ny`e seti. Vol. 3. no. 3, P. 255–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2024-3-3-255-263.
EDN: AVOISJ. (In Russ.).
Dubnoviczkaya, A.A. (2021). Kto dovolen svoej zarplatoj? O chem govoryat danny`e RME`Z. Prikladnaya e`konometrika. no. 4 (64),
P. 49–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2021-64-49-69. EDN: XHNASD. (In Russ.).
Il`icheva, L.E. and Lapin, A.V. (2022) Cennostny`e i social`ny`e de-terminanty` ustojchivogo razvitiya rossijskix regionov v e`poxu glob-al`noj civilizacionnoj deformacii: monografiya. M.: «Izdatel`stvo «Prospekt». 344 p. EDN: YYBPSL. (In Russ.).
Kossova, E.V. and Kosorukova, M.A. (2023) Ocenivanie vliyaniya vy`sshego obrazovaniya na zdorov`e: sravnenie mnogomernoj rekur-sivnoj probit-modeli i me`tchinga. Prikladnaya e`konometrika. no. 1 (69), P. 65–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2023-69-65-90. EDN: CVZBKK. (In Russ.).
Landerova, A.A. and Rossenko, L.A. (2022) Reputacionny`e faktory` sub``ekta Rossijskoj Federacii: sociokul`turny`j i politicheskij aspekty`. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya. Vol. 22, no. 1,
P. 100–110. DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2022-1-100-110. EDN: TGSVTC. (In Russ.).
Nosko, V.P. (2021) E`konometrika: v 2-x knigax. Kn.1. M.: Delo. 704 c. (In Russ.).
Revenko, V.V. (2024) Differenciaciya ponyatij «obraz», «imidzh», «reputaciya» i «brend» v politicheskom diskurse. Problemy` upravleni-ya Minsk, no. 3 (93), P. 96–100. EDN: PNLDEX. (In Russ.).
Rogachev, S.V., Il`icheva, M.V. and Ivanov, A.V. (2022) Social`noe doverie i process konsolidacii obshhestva: novy`e vozmozhnosti i riski. Izvestiya Tul`skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarny`e nauki. no. 1, P. 129-140. DOI: 10.24412/2071-6141-2022-1-129-140 EDN: NOCHSG. (In Russ.).
Cherkashin, M.D. (2019) Doverie naseleniya k organam vlasti kak faktor social`noj konsolidacii obshhestva. Kommunikologiya: e`lektronny`j nauchny`j zhurnal. Vol. 4. no. 3, p. 74–82. EDN: RTDZET. (In Russ.).
Shestakova, E.V. (2022) Ispol`zovanie novy`x cifrovy`x texnologij dlya upravleniya reputaciej v sisteme organov gosudarstvennoj vlasti (na primere Permskogo kraya).Goroda i mestny`e soobshhestva. Vol. 1.
Pp. 295–304. EDN: SIOMQI. (In Russ.).
Agresti, A. (2012) Categorical Data Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 742 p. (In Eng.).
Bustos, E.O. (2021) Organizational Reputation in the Public Administra-tion: A Systematic Literature Review. Public Administration Review.
Vol. 81. no. 2, P. 731–751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13363.
(In Eng.).
Lee, D. & Van Ryzin, G.G. (2019) Measuring bureaucratic reputation: Scale development and validation. Governance. Vol. 32. no. 1. p. 177–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12371. (In Eng.).
Lee, D.Vand Ryzin, G.G. (2020) Bureaucratic reputation in the eyes of cit-izens: an analysis of US federal agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 86. no. 1, P. 183–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318769127. (In Eng.).
McCullagh, P. (1980). Regression Models for Ordinal Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). no. 42 (2),
P. 109–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x. (In Eng.).
Morrow-Howell, N. & Proctor, E. (1992). The Use of Logistic Regression in Social Work Research. Journal of Social Service Research. Vol. 16. no. 1-2. Pp. 87–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v16n01_05. (In Eng.).
Wasserman, S. and Pattison, P. (1996) Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika. no. 61(3). Pp. 401–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294547. (In Eng.).
Yang, J., Dong, C. and Chen, Y. (2021) Government’s Economic Perfor-mance Fosters Trust in Government in China: Assessing the Moderating Effect of Respect for Authority. Social Indicators Research. Vol. 154. no. 2,
p. 545–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02553-y. (In Eng.).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nina N. Rozanova Stanislav A. Ksenofontov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
