Political practice of application and interpretation of the princi- ples of the peoples’ right to self-determination and territorial integrity of states

EDN: MQXRWO DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2022-17-6-67-86

Authors

  • Filatov M. S. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Keywords:

international relations, territorial integrity, self-determination, principle of territorial integrity, Russia, Kosovo, Pridnestrovie, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Crimea

Abstract

The opposing positions of countries on the application of the principles of the peoples’ right to self-determination and the territorial integrity of states are considered. The purpose of the article is to prove that the positions taken by countries are not determined by international legal norms or a custom, but by political necessity. Research methods: com- parative, historical, systematic methods and content analysis of documents. The main results of the work are the following provisions. The situation with the secession of Kosovo from Serbia, the recognition of Kosovo's independence by a numberof states was the first precedent in the application of the principles of the peoples’ right to self-determination. Then, first of all, the Western countries adopted an atypical posi- tion for them to deny the inviolability of the borders of the state of Serbia. On the other hand, these same countries are characterized by persistent non-recog- nition and disregard for the independence declara- tions of Pridnestrovie, South Ossetia and Abkhazia. According to the results of the study, the author came to the following conclusion. Research results. The au- thor proved that in the situation with Kosovo, the countries of the West made a strategic mistake in the political interpretation of the principles of the peo- ples’ right to self-determination and territorial integ- rity of states. This bloc of states has shown that in practice it is ready to deviate from predictable and le- gally correct interpretations of the principles under consideration, moreover, under the influence of polit- ical expediency.

Author Biography

Filatov M. S., Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Postgraduate student

References

Галинский И. Н., Мачуга В. В. Молдово-приднестровский кон- фликт: особенности развития в начале XXI в. // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. — 2018. — № 2. — С. 49— 56.

Галинский Я. О. Национальная идея как детерминант самоопре- деления и консолидации приднестровского народа // Власть. — 2019.

— № 2. — С. 136—142.

Галинский Я. О. Политический статус Приднестровской Молдав- ской Республики и ее политических институтов // Власть. — 2018. —

№ 2. — С. 124—129.

Иванов О. Б. Приднестровский конфликт: современное состоя- ние и пути решения // Мировая политика. — 2018. — № 1. — С. 1—12.

Кусайкина М. В., Чертакова А. И. Реализация принципа равно- правия и самоопределения народов: непризнанные и частично при- знанные государства // Теория права и межгосударственных отноше- ний. — 2018. — № 1 (7). — С. 40—45.

Никанорова М. И. История развития принципов территориаль- ной целостности и признания права народов на самоопределение // Научный альманах. — Тамбов: ООО «Консалтинговая компания

«Юком», 2018. — С. 102—105.

Паращевина Е. А., Карасева Е. М. Право наций на самоопределе- ние на примере воссоединения Крыма и России // Инновационная наука. — 2016. — № 4-4. — С. 143—146.

Строева А. С. Проблема признания Косова // Актуальные про- блемы российского права. — 2011. — № 4 (21). — С. 275—276.

Хасанов А. А. Соотношение и взаимодействие принципов само- определения народов и территориальной целостности государств // Журнал российского права. — 2017. — № 10 (250). — С. 133—142.

Joffe Paul Self-determination and territorial integrity // Un declara- tion on the rights of indigenous peoples. 2020. 1—12 p.

Kapustin, A. Y. (2015) Crimea’s Self-Determination in the Light of Contemporary International Law // Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht ZaöRV. –№ 75. –P. 101—118.

Simon, Н. (1997) Administrative Behavior: А Study of Decision-Mak- ing Process in Administrative Organizations. N. У. –Р. 84.

Galinskij, I. N., Machuga, V. V. (2018) Moldovo-pridnestrovskij kon- flikt: osobennosti razvitiya v nachale XXI v. [Moldovo-Pridnestrovian con- flict: features of development at the beginning of the XXI century] // Vestnik Mos-kovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University]. –№ 2. –P. 49—56. (In Russ.)

Galinskij, YA. O. (2019) Nacional'naya ideya kak determinant samo- opredeleniya i konsolidacii pridnestrovskogo naroda [National idea as a de- terminant of self-determination and consolidation of the Pridnestrovian people] // Vlast' [Power]. № 2. –P. 136—142. (In Russ.)

Galinskij, YA. O. (2018) Politicheskij status Pridnestrovskoj Mol- davskoj Respubliki i ee politicheskih institutov [The political status of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic and its political institutions] // Vlast' [Power]. –№ 2. –P. 124—129. (In Russ.)

Ivanov, O. B. (2018) Pridnestrovskij konflikt: sovremennoe sostoya- nie i puti resheniya [Pridnestrovian conflict: the current state and ways of solution] // Mirovaya politika [World Politics]. № 1. P. 1—12. (In Russ.)

Kusajkina, M. V., CHertakova, A. I. (2018) Realizaciya principa ravno- praviya i samoopredeleniya narodov: nepriznannye i chastichno priznannye gosudarstva [Implementation of the principle of equality and self-determi- nation of peoples: unrecognized and partially recognized States] // Teoriya prava i mezhgosudarstven-nyh otnoshenij [Theory of law and interstate re- lations]. –№ 1 (7). –p. 40—45. (In Russ.)

Nikanorova, M. I. (2018) Istoriya razvitiya principov territorial'-noj celostnosti i priznaniya prava narodov na samoopredele-nie [History of the development of the principles of territorial integrity and recognition of the right of peoples to self-determination] // Nauchnyj al'manah [Scientific Al- manac]. Tambov: OOO «Konsaltingovaya kompaniya «YUkom» [Tambov: LLC "Consulting Company "Yukom"]. P. 102—105. (In Russ.)

Parashchevina, E. A., Karaseva, E. M. (2016) Pravo nacij na samoo- prede-lenie na primere vossoedineniya Kryma i Rossii [The right of nations to self-determination on the example of the reunification of Crimea and Rus- sia] // Innova-cionnaya nauka [Innova-tion nauka]. № 4-4. –P. 143—146. (In Russ.)

Stroeva, A. S. (2011) Problema priznaniya Kosova [The problem of recognition of Kosovo] // Aktual'nye pro-blemy rossijskogo prava [Current problems of Russian law]. –№ 4 (21). –P. 275—276. (In Russ.)

Hasanov, A. A. (2017) Sootnoshenie i vzaimodejstvie principov samo- opredeleniya narodov i territorial'noj celostnosti gosu-darstv [Correlation and interaction of the principles of self-determination of peoples and terri- torial integrity of states] // ZHurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law]. –№ 10 (250). –P. 133—142. (In Russ.)

Том 17 выпуск 6 2022

Published

2022-12-26

How to Cite

Filatov М. С. (2022). Political practice of application and interpretation of the princi- ples of the peoples’ right to self-determination and territorial integrity of states : EDN: MQXRWO DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2022-17-6-67-86. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 17(6), 67–86. Retrieved from https://orelvestnik.ru/index.php/srvon/article/view/259

Issue

Section

Внешний мир и геополитические процессы